Natural or artificial turf?

March 3rd, 2009 | By: Hugo | 2 Comments »

Nowadays many local teams are planning to change their natural grass for an artificial turf. There are many pros and cons on this subject. As you might know, living in the tropic is very nice, but you get heavy rain in the winter, so the grass gets really mushy and slippery. And when you have 22 players on a wet, swampy pitch it can literally destroy the grass. This is why many teams are considering the artificial turf because rainy days wouldn´t be a problem anymore. The teams that are currently planning to do so are: Santos de Guapiles, Paraiso de Cartago, San Carlos, and Alajuelense (under construction). Brujas FC and Barrio Mexico have an artificial grass surface. Saprissa was the fist team that placed artificlal turf, it was about 5 years ago and it cost around $US 600 000.

Making this change is not cheap at all. But you have to consider which is more expensive, giving maintenance to an always green, no lawn cutting, artificial pitch… or natural grass which depends strictly on the weather, fertilizers, plagues, sunlight etc. I would stick to option A, but there are more things to consider.

Many doctors say that artificial grass can cause more knee injuries. The surface is harder and when a player falls, its knees can get really hurt. A natural surface gives sort of a ¨natural bounce¨. I´m not saying that if you play on a natural pitch, you cant get injuries, but its much more soft. Another thing to consider is that the ball has a strange bounce on an artificial pitch; many players complain about this.

Having an artificial pitch means that your surface can take much more stress, so that means that you can shows, concerts, and many other things that can bring some money in. This is why many teams are considering the change also.

I think that having artificial grass can really help local teams not having to delay or suspend fixtures because of bad weather. But if it was up to me, I would invest in the best drainage systems, instead of changing to an artificial surface.

What do you think??



Related Posts



Subscribe
 

rss icon Costa Rica World Cup RSS Feed

Print
Print this article
Share
del.icio.us:Natural or artificial turf? digg:Natural or artificial turf? newsvine:Natural or artificial turf? reddit:Natural or artificial turf? fark:Natural or artificial turf? Y!:Natural or artificial turf? stumbleupon:Natural or artificial turf?

Comments
Username By Pseudinho | March 4th, 2009 at 12:03 am
top comment
cornercorner

Ask the players and they will all tell you they prefer a good natural grass field over any playing surface. It’s what they are used to playing on and have played most of their life on. Why change it up to save a few pennies and compromise the beauty of the game.

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By Harryfoster | April 15th, 2009 at 5:47 am
top comment
cornercorner

Yes it’s true but what i think that while using the artificial turf we have several benefits like recycling the tyres and other waste full products.It help to save water up to millions of gallons of water.

cornercorner


Comments are closed


 
Go to WCB Homepage




Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for World Cup Blog?
Email tips[at]worldcupblog[dot]org

Costa Rica Club Football News

More North America Blogs

Monthly Archives

closer
World Cup Blog